Proof 2 of Pythagorean Theorem: The Puzzle Shift
A visual dissection proof showing two ways to fill an (a+b)×(a+b) square. Both use four identical right triangles (legs a and b). The remaining space is a² + b² in one arrangement, c² in the other. Therefore a² + b² = c².
Prerequisites: pythagorean-theorem · Difficulty: beginner
We want to prove the Pythagorean theorem:
Strategy: treat it as a puzzle. Fill an square in two ways, both using the same four right triangles (legs , , hypotenuse ). One arrangement leaves a green square and a red square; the other leaves a single tilted blue square. Since the triangles are identical, the leftover spaces must be equal.
Step 1: The Square
Consider a square with side length . We'll show two different ways to fill this square, both using four identical right triangles.
Step 2: Configuration 1: Two Squares + Four Triangles
Fill the big square with a green square, a red square, and four right triangles. The two smaller squares sit in opposite corners, while the four triangles fill the remaining L-shaped regions.
Total area = (area of four triangles).
Step 3: Pythagorean Theorem
Proof strategy (puzzle shift). Conservation of area: the same four triangles can be rearranged inside the outer square to leave either the region (Configuration 1) or a single region (Configuration 2). The leftover spaces must be equal, so .
Step 4: Configuration 2: One Tilted Square + Four Triangles
Rearrange the same four triangles within the big square. Place them in the four corners, and the space remaining in the center forms a tilted blue square with side .
Total area = (area of four triangles).
Step 5: Same Total, Same Four Triangles
Both configurations fill the same big square (area ) and use the same four identical triangles (total triangle area: ). The only difference is the remaining space!
Step 6: Conclusion:
Subtracting the four triangles from both configurations: Configuration 1 gives , and Configuration 2 gives . Since these remaining spaces must be equal:
Since we only moved the triangles and didn't change the total area:
This remaining space must be equal in both configurations, proving:
Why This Proof Works
This proof is powerful because it:
- Uses the conservation of area — moving shapes doesn't change their total area
- Is visual and intuitive — you can "see" why the theorem is true
- Requires no algebra — just geometric reasoning
Historical Context
This type of "dissection proof" has been used for centuries. Similar proofs appear in ancient Chinese mathematics (the Zhoubi Suanjing) and Indian mathematics (Bhāskara's proof). ∎